Loading...
cayCompass.com :: Chuckie chastises PPM
Compass
Search
Today's Date: 29 July 2010
Last Updated: 29 July 2010 14:31:25 CIT
CayCompass Community
Find us on Facebook
Chuckie chastises PPM
Says no protest march support undermines party's credibility on education reform
By: Alan Markoff | alan@cfp.ky
12 March 2010
|

Former Cabinet Minister Charles Clifford has criticised the People’s Progressive Movement for not supporting his planned protest march.

In a press release issued late Wednesday, Mr. Clifford announced that he was cancelling the march because of his political party’s lack of support.

“The PPM’s decision not to continue to support the protest march has removed a significant part of the organisational support and resources for the protest march,” Mr. Clifford stated. “This will prevent us from achieving success with respect to the other part of the reason for the march, which is the reversal of the UDP Government’s damaging changes to our immigration policies.”

Mr. Clifford stated that the march was always planned to be a non-partisan protest of PPM members and non-PPM members.

Originally the PPM was going to support a march that had a second purpose other than to protest the ruling United Democratic Party’s announced changes to immigration policy.  However, when Premier McKeeva Bush said he was backing away from plans to sell the now-under-construction Government Administration Building – the other reason for the protest – the PPM backed away from supporting the march.

Mr. Clifford said he was disappointed in the PPM’s position, given “the significant negative impact these immigration policy changes will have on young Caymanians and Caymanians who are already working in major industries.

“…I encourage the PPM leadership to reconsider their position on this matter,” he said. “To ignore it will undermine the PPM’s focus and credibility on educational reform because these immigration policy changes will certainly emasculate the educational reform efforts of the PPM.

Mr. Clifford is opposing recent changes made to immigration policy, particularly with respect to key employees.

Most foreign workers in the Cayman Islands are subject to a seven-year term limit. Once they reach that limit, they must leave the Islands for at least one year before they can return.  However, people who are designated key employees by meeting specified criteria can remain and work in the Cayman Islands for nine years, long enough to apply for permanent residence after they have been here eight years. 

Permanent residence is granted to those who meet certain criteria set out in an established points system. If an applicant for permanent residence fails to get the required number of points, he or she must leave the Islands for at least one year.  Applicants that are granted permanent residence can remain and work in the Cayman Islands in their given profession for the rest of their lives. After having resided in the Cayman Islands for 15 years, those with permanent residence can apply for Caymanian Status, which could only be denied for specific reasons.

The changes to immigration policy published in the Cayman Islands Gazette in January define 20 specific positions in the financial industry as key positions. A direction issued by the government to the immigration boards is for there to be a presumption if favour of granting a key employee designation of any foreign worker who was is hired to fill those key positions, as long as the employee fulfils certain criteria and there’s not a Caymanian available to fill the position.

Mr. Clifford has stated that the UDP intends to grant the key employee designation to 9,000 immigrant workers in financial and other industries a claim that has been vehemently denied by the government, which has said far fewer people would qualify for the designation.

In his press release Wednesday, Mr. Clifford said his opposition to the changes in the policy concerning key employee status was not “an anti-expatriate protest”.

“I have always recognised and acknowledged that our economic success is largely the result of the correct balance of Caymanians and expatriates in the workforce.”

But he said allowing the policy changes to stand would ultimately result in the “deterioration of our social harmony, which is a significant part of the foundation for our success and attractiveness as a country”

“This will result in an increase in social problems and various categories of crime, which is why expatriate workers, just like Caymanians, must take a keen interest in this issue,” he said.

PPM member Alden McLaughlin made a short statement about the party’s decision to withdraw its support for the protest march.

“The principal objective of the PPM supporting the march has been achieved,” he said. “The Government has announced that it will not proceed with the divestment of the [Government Office Accommodation Building]. The PPM executive decided that in the circumstances we would not march. Mr Clifford disagrees with that decision. It is as simple as that.”

Compass reporter Brent Fuller contributed to this article.

 
Share your Comment
We welcome your comments on our stories. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited.
IMPORTANT IDENTITY INFORMATION: You will be able to create a ‘nickname’ which will allow you to remain anonymous, however, whilst we collect login information from you, this information will be kept confidential and only used to contact you directly, if required. We require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification.
Please login to comment on our stories.    Log In | Register
 
 
Copyright © 2010 Cayman Free Press Ltd. All Rights Reserved. (w)