cayCompass.com :: Jury rules death by natural causes
Compass
Search
Today's Date: 09 February 2012
Last Updated: 08 February 2012 14:07:43 CIT
CayCompass Community
Find us on Facebook
Jury rules death by natural causes
By: Stuart Wilson | stuart@cfp.ky
10 March 2010

A Coroner’s Jury ruled last month that the death of Alfred William Billes was by natural causes.  Mr. Billes, 71, died on 12 May, 2007.

During an inquest conducted by Queen’s Coroner Nova Hall, the jury heard evidence from Dierdre Billes, the third child of Mr. Billes.

Ms Billes said on 11 May 2007, her father fell from the bed at his residence in Laguna Del Mar.

Her mother tried to call 911 but was unsuccessful. She also tried to get in touch with the family doctor but was unable to do so.

Mrs. Billes then contacted Dierdre, who went to their home at about 8:10am and saw two ambulances. Her father was on a stretcher but was conscious and talking to medics.

He was subsequently admitted to the critical ward at the George Town Hospital.

Ms Billes said on 12 May, she was at Hospital when her father passed away at around 4.30am.

She added that he had a heart attack in 1997 and was experiencing heart trouble, in addition to having major knee surgery in 2004, 2005.

An autopsy listed his cause of death as hypotension; pulmonary edema due to acute appendicitis with peritonitis.

Ms Billes related an incident that occurred six months after her father’s death. It involved a tenant who consulted the same doctor her father had been a patient of. The tenant went to the doctor, was given medication and sent home.

The tenant then went to the Chrissie Tomlinson Memorial Hospital, where Dr. Stephen Tomlinson removed her appendix.

When asked by a juror why she had mentioned her tenant’s plight, Ms Billes replied that the doctor “missed something he shouldn’t have if he had been concentrating, and nowadays you can’t miss a simple diagnosis.”

A statement from a police officer who attended the hospital, as per protocol after a death, was also read into evidence.

The officer said he observed no signs of trauma. He met with the wife of the deceased, who explained her husband had a medical history of heart trouble and was experiencing abdominal pains, as well as perspiring a lot. He said Mr. Billes’ widow added that she had taken her husband to the doctor, who prescribed medication and sent him home.

Testimony was also given by Dr. Shravan Joyti, pathologist at the George Town Hospital. He explained to the jury information contained in the autopsy report. The autopsy itself had been performed by the previous pathologist, Dr. John Heidingsfelder.

Mr. John had noted Mr. Billes’ medical history, which included an enlarged heart and calcified coronary arteries. The deceased was also described as markedly obese, being six feet tall and weighing between 350 and 375 pounds.

Mr Joyti described the process of Mr. Billes’ death. He was asked whether the outcome would have been different if the patient had been dealt with differently by his private physician.

Mr. Joyti said the appendix can burst at any time in acute cases – up to 48 hours.

“But most of the time when proper treatment is administered we don’t see rupture. Either a surgeon would take the bold decision of cutting out the appendix or administering medication in the form of antibiotics that can defer the surgery two to three weeks,” Mr. Joyti said.

He added that it was impossible to tell what stage the patient was at when the doctor saw him and the decision to conduct surgery or prescribe medication is up to the physician’s discretion.

Mr. Joyti also commented on the report that Mr. Billes had been moving furniture before becoming ill. He said that would not have caused the appendix to rupture.

After witness testimonies were given, the coroner advised jurors they had to decide whether Mr. Billes died of natural causes or by misadventure.

Suicide was ruled out as a possible cause of death.

The Magistrate explained that “misadventure” was meant in the context of things that do not occur in a person’s everyday life. She asked that the jurors come back with a unanimous verdict or a majority of six to one, five to two.

The courts do not accept a 4 to 3 verdict in coroner’s inquests, even though it is a majority. If jurors are unable to come back with a verdict, they can deliver an “open verdict”.

After about 15 minutes of deliberations, the jury came back with a verdict of death by natural causes.

 
Share your Comment
We welcome your comments on our stories. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited.
IMPORTANT IDENTITY INFORMATION: You will be able to create a ‘nickname’ which will allow you to remain anonymous, however, whilst we collect login information from you, this information will be kept confidential and only used to contact you directly, if required. We require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification.
Please login to comment on our stories.    Log In | Register
 
 
Copyright © 2012 Cayman Free Press Ltd. All Rights Reserved.