Loading...
cayCompass.com :: Burglar asks for help with addiction
Compass
Search
Today's Date: 29 July 2010
Last Updated: 29 July 2010 14:31:25 CIT
CayCompass Community
Find us on Facebook
Burglar asks for help with addiction
Court can't order treatment
By: Carol Winker | carol@cfp.ky
9 March 2010
|

After he was found to be ineligible for the Drug Rehabilitation Court, Joel Jason Smith was returned to the regular Summary Court where last week he received prison sentences totalling three years.

Smith, who turned 45 the next day, had pleaded guilty to two commercial burglaries and one charge of handling a stolen bicycle.

Chief Magistrate Margaret Ramsay-Hale noted that Smith had asked to be admitted to the drug court but was refused because he had previous convictions for offences involving violence.

“Sometimes, because of cooperation between the prison and counselling services, an inmate can go from prison to Caribbean Haven before release,” she said, referring to the residential treatment centre.

“It’s nothing the court can direct. But in certain cases, through the Probation and Aftercare Team, it can happen,” she told Smith. It was not that there was no possibility of treatment, but it would have to be under different provisions.

A prison officer present confirmed that there is a direct provision for transition to Caribbean Haven.

Smith had been before the courts for some time and had a history of drug abuse for 20 years. But, the chief magistrate commented, “There was a time 2003 - 2008 when we did not see you.”

Defence Attorney John Furniss said Smith’s drug problem had been behind the bulk of his offences. The years he had not been in trouble were years he had the support of a female friend who since died.

Smith’s case of drug abuse was not a simple one, Mr. Furniss continued. “He may have been able to control it to the extent of working during the week and using on weekends. But then the whole world falls apart. He is trying to get treatment.”

Crown Counsel Marilyn Brandt provided details of the offences.

Police were summoned to the scene of the first burglary, Dell’s Shoes and Accessories in George Town, on 13 April, 2009. They found that a rear door had been forced open with a crowbar. Stolen goods included clothing, shoes, watches and $47 cash.

Officers also found a shirt on the floor. It had been worn and they retrieved it for testing. DNA was obtained from the shirt and found to match the DNA of Smith.

The second burglary was reported on 4 May, 2009. The owner of La Sherie in George Town had locked and secured the premises. When she returned she discovered clothing on the floor and jewellery missing. Police attended and found that a steel grill on a window had been cut off. The glass was smashed and an office ransacked.

Ms Brandt said police received information that led them to a female. Their inquiries then led to Smith.

Value of the stolen items was $55,346, with only $2,500 worth recovered.

 The incident involving the bicycle occurred in late April 2009 when the owner put the bike on her porch at night but did not secure it. The next morning it was gone.

In May, she was at Kirk Supermarket when she was informed that her bike was outside. She went and saw Smith with the bike and confronted him. He said he had borrowed it from a relative, but the relative denied any knowledge. Smith subsequently pleaded guilty to handling.

The magistrate asked how Smith could have stolen $55,000 worth of goods from La Sherie – had he backed up a truck to the premises?

Mr. Furniss said three people were charged with that burglary. “Bags of stuff went out the window” to a man outside, he explained. He said that man had pleaded not guilty to burglary and was awaiting trial; the female co-accused had a different profile and was in a different programme.

It was not known whether the shop owner was insured.

In passing sentence, the magistrate took into account that the burglaries occurred at night when no one was present and therefore not in physical danger. A first offence of commercial burglary would attract nine to 15 months, she indicated.

But the aggravating features included the value of the goods, the small amount recovered and the damage done. In addition, Smith had previous convictions for burglary.

“I’m giving a longer sentence and hope he will be able to access treatment at the end,” she said.

 
Share your Comment
We welcome your comments on our stories. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited.
IMPORTANT IDENTITY INFORMATION: You will be able to create a ‘nickname’ which will allow you to remain anonymous, however, whilst we collect login information from you, this information will be kept confidential and only used to contact you directly, if required. We require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification.
Please login to comment on our stories.    Log In | Register
 
View Comments
User Avatar
Burglar asks for help with addiction
Posted by Beach Boy on 3/9/2010 3:49:37 PM

What A Joke!!! So there was no danger to the owners of the premesis!! 3 burglaries and this guy has to serve 2 years. (I understand that time served is actually 2/3 of the sentence.) I think that 9 years would have been more appropriate. One year for each offence and then he should have to reimburse the business owners. As for treatment for his drug abuse, it is apparent that he can do without the drugs if at one point he only used on the weekends. So why not have him serve 2 years of his sentence and then be admitted to the treatment program? At the rate that crimes are being committed we had better start wondering where we are going to find money in the budget to expand the prison. I have an idea. Why doesn't the government build some makeshift concrete cells on that farm land that they have and feed them selves. Maybe that would be a deterant for some of these low life scum bags!!! BTW I'm 100% Caymanian and I am sick of this screwed up system!!
Agree agree ( 1 )
Disagree disagree ( 0 )
 
Copyright © 2010 Cayman Free Press Ltd. All Rights Reserved. (w)